AMD Radeon RX Vega 10. So you shouldn’t realistically expect to play the latest AAA games on these Vega integrated GPUs, there’s only so much they can do. At the same time, Ryzen 5 and 7 based ultrabooks offer a competent alternative for the Intel + MX250/330 models in the lower price brackets, most likely with increased efficiency and lower temperatures, so these are definitely something to keep an eye on. Now let’s look at some games. However, they won’t run at full frequencies in most of the ultraportable Ryzen U implementations, as is the case with the ZenBook 14 UM433 and IdeaPad Slim 7 included here. The Zenbook 14 ultraportable implementation, on the other hand, clocks down aggressively to .95 – 1.2 GHz in the more demanding titles, such as Far Cry 5 or Wicher 3. Based on 2,087 user benchmarks for the AMD RX Vega 10 (Ryzen iGPU) and the Intel Iris Xe, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. This... Huawei Matebook 14 review (AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, 3:2 display), Asus Zephyrus G14 revisited – one month later (Ryzen 9 4900HS performance and gaming, vs Ryzen 7 4800HS), Lenovo Legion 5 review (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GTX 1650Ti gaming laptop), ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 17 review (2020 G732LXS model – Core i7/i9, RTX 2080 150W). The Radeon RX Vega 64 rivalled Nvidia's high-end GeForce GTX 1080 on its launch in summer 2017, but in the past eighteen months AMD's high-end Vega … But, it offers improved game smoothness over the Radeon Vega 8 and other similar basic graphics processors like the widely used Intel UHD series. Razer Blade Stealth 2020 - Cursed by Intel - Duration: 8:21. In conclusion, Nvidia MX350 configurations should be your number one choice if interested in compact ultrabooks with some gaming prowess at around the $800-$1200 mark. Radeon RX Vega 7 videocard released by AMD; release date: 7 Jan 2020. With that in mind, the first part of this article focuses on the Radeon Vega 7 and 8 graphics, and we’ll talk about the MX250/MX350 alternatives further down. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 is an integrated GPU for notebooks. Has 3dMark Firestrike graphics performance been measured on a Ryzen 7 4700u reference notebook by laptopmedia or are these AMD provided numbers. We’ve reviewed a couple of different laptops built on Intel’s Tiger Lake Core hardware in the last weeks, but most of those were high-tier products with matching price-tags. Your email address will not be published. The new mobile Ryzen 7 2700U APU combines a powerful quad-core/eight-thread CPU with the all-new integrated Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics chip in a 15W-rated package. Vega 8 – IdeaPad 7. AMD's Radeon Vega 7 integrated GPU in the Ryzen 7 4800H can deliver decent entry level gaming performance. Just make sure to read proper reviews to figure out how the particularities and quirks of each implementation, so you’ll know what you’ll be getting into. Boost clock speed - 1600 MHz. However, they won’t run at full frequencies in most of the ultraportable Ryzen U implementations, as is the case with the ZenBook 14 UM433 and IdeaPad Slim 7 included here. This chart compares the AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (Ryzen 4000 Mobile) with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. A quick look at HBM2 Grades and you get what you pay for! Die AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ist eine integrierte Grafikkarte für Notebooks. LOW. The bigger one has the advantage with its 1600MHz boost core clock but the Vega 6 isn’t too far away with 1500MHz. Hi. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Still, GTX 1650Ti configurations are also available in a few ultraportable formats, and would offer a significant boost in most games. How does the the power draw for the MX 350 and 330 compare to the Vega 8 and 7? Battlefield V, The Witcher 3, Dota 2 – recorded with Fraps/in-game FPS counter in game mode; Far Cry 5, Middle Earth, Strange Brigade, Red Dead Redemption 2, Tomb Raider games – recorded with the included Benchmark utilities. AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (Ryzen 4000, 15W) 36 fps. Are the results for the MX350 based on the 10W or the 25W implementation? The power logs and included in the review here: https://www.ultrabookreview.com/37505-asus-zenbook-um433iq-review/ . The Vega8 scores high as well and even outmatches the MX350 in the more demanding titles, but don’t forget that’s on a Ryzen 9 configuration, so the increased CPU power and the competent thermal design play a major role in those scores. 2007 - 2020 Some rights reserved - LaptopMedia.com But the gap widens in more demanding CPU + GPU loads, such as demanding real-life games. GAMEPLAY VIDEO. Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. It's a shame about the low Vulkan numbers – I want Vulkan to do excellent things, but it seems to be falling by the wayside. Rise of the Tomb Raider. Please read and accept our website Terms and Privacy Policy to post a comment. New; 4:44. Battlefield V, The Witcher 3, Dota 2 – recorded with MSI Afterburner in game mode; Bioshock Far Cry 5, Middle Earth, Strange Brigade, Red Dead Redemption 2, Tomb Raider games – recorded with the included Benchmark utilities. The Vega 7 and 8 chips beat the MX250 implementation, though, and they should outscore the similar MX330 as well. MX350 still takes the cake though. Thanks for the comparison – it's very helpful. The thermal module pays an even more important role in MX implementations, though, as it also has to handle the extra power of these Nvidia chips. Furthermore, some of the AMD configurations will also integrate Nvidia graphics, and it’s interesting to find out whether those AMD+Nvidia configurations are actually worth paying extra for. The Vega iGPU is showing higher FPS results in DOTA 2, Battlefield V, DOOM, Rainbow Six Siege (Very High and Ultra), and League Of Legends. AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 remove from comparison. Be sure to read the HotHardware review of the Radeon RX Vega 64 right here. Here’s what we got: The MX350 wins in most cases, and by a fair margin over the Vega 7 and MX250 in the same ZenBook 14 chassis. This chart compares the AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (Ryzen 4000 Mobile) with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. MED. Video Card Benchmarks - Over 1,000,000 Video Cards and 3,900 Models Benchmarked and compared in graph form - This page contains a graph which includes benchmark results for high end Video Cards - such as recently released ATI and nVidia video cards using the PCI-Express standard. Among those Nvidia options, the MX330 is a rebadged MX250 from last year, but the MX350 is a different GPU based on the GP107 chiplet, thus the most competent option here. ... High Performance is the discrete Radeon RX … Strengths Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 → 100% n=21 Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) → 116% n=21 Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Many... 2020 Holiday Deals on ultrabooks and portable laptops, The search for the best wireless keyboard: Logitech K400 Plus vs. K830 vs. MX Keys, Fanless and silent laptops, Chromebooks and ultrabooks in 2020 – a detailed list, Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA vs ZenBook 14 UX425JA compared, Copyright © 2011-2019 Ultrabookreview.com. Terrible average bench The AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) averaged 83.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. Pricing is going to be the determining factor in who is victorious (as if we didn't already know that ;) ). The results below are from our tests of the Zenbook 14 UM433 (with Vega 7 and MX350 10W graphics) and the ZenBook 14 UX434 (with MX250 10W graphics). I specifically disabled the Nvidia GPUs to see how these Vega 7/8 chips perform in an ideal implementation with an over-competent thermal module. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). Chromebooks are snappy, easy to use, and inexpensive computers designed for everyday use and Internet-based activities such as browsing, email, text-editing, Youtube, Netflix, light gaming, and the likes. With that in mind, let’s have a quick look at the specs sheet. I was expecting they'd draw about the same, at around 25W. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 is an integrated GPU for notebooks. It is used in the Ryzen 4000 mobile APUs, which were launched early 2020. Down in AMD’s camp, however, things are a bit different, as the Renoir Ryzen 4000 mobile platforms bundle some decent Vega 6, 7, and 8 integrated graphics, which could actually suffice for light and casual gaming by their own. Real notebook reviews and analysis by real people. Vega 7 … It is used in the Ryzen 4000 mobile APUs, which were launched early 2020. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega-56 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions. LaptopMedia 1 view. Now, you should only take this article as a general reference of what to expect from these platforms, and make sure to go through our detailed reviews for more in-depth tests and analysis. Run an Official Game Benchmark and note the FPS results. With that in mind, let’s look over some benchmark results: The Zenbook is within 10-20% of the G14 implementations in these tests, which is definitely not bad. RX vega 7 benchmarks, RX vega 7 performance data from OpenBenchmarking.org and the Phoronix Test Suite. LaptopMedia.com Laptop GPU Specs AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (Ryzen 4000, 35/45W) From: Simeon Nikolov 16 September 2020 / 05:41 | 0 Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Simpler titles such as Dota2 run well even on the ZenBook 14, but even in this case, there’s a noticeable difference between playing with Low or High settings. This chart compares the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL Graphics with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 remove from comparison. Required fields are marked *. implement MX330 and MX350 Nvidia graphics, regular Ryzen U 4800U + Vega8 ultraportables, ompact ultrabooks with some gaming prowess, Asus Zenbook 14 UX434FLC (Intel Core i7) vs UM433IQ (AMD Ryzen 7) compared, https://www.ultrabookreview.com/37505-asus-zenbook-um433iq-review/, Best Chromebooks of 2020 – comparisons, reviews and buying guide. Our findings are based on several Asus G14 configurations running on Vega 7 and Vega 8 graphics. That’s especially interesting since many of the Intel-based ultrabooks of this 2020 generation are going to implement MX330 and MX350 Nvidia graphics, especially on the Comet Lake variants that still relly on mediocre 2016-level GT2 UHD integrated graphics. We ran a couple of DX11, DX12, and Vulkan titles on the best-performance profiles available in each case and FHD resolution/lowest graphics settings. You can also check out our GeForce GTX 1080 Ti review here . This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list. VERY HIGH. See all AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (Ryzen 4000, 15W) configurations.