amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings system memory:8172 MB ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz Max GPU Temp: 80°C I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz is that right? 2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and Window mode: fullscreen 72 degrees C 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. crap monitor x.x) Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Th… Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples System Memory: 16330 MB You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). – added Preset:2160 scores. CPU Speed: 3510MHz – GeForce GTX TITAN MSAA samples: 0 temperature 57°C. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? amd a4 5300 3.4ghz cpu, as stated the cpu is NOT overclocked and last reported running at 3.67, 3.37* as 3.67 would be clocked. Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess. Max GPU Temp: 80°C Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples 15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti, What about the GTX 560? 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) Preset:1080 AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) Memory clock: 1500 MHz Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. 63Deg C. Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples Preset:1080 @ 2xAA Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) Shapphire Radeon HD 6850 Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. Here's the excel doc. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187) I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) Why is there no 6850 listed? Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. Windows XP 32 Bit RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples 2 different tests on 15 min burn. , 6569 points (72 FPS) with two MSI GTX 670’s. Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive Min temp 60°C My non-overclocked GTX-1070 achieves a FurMark score of 5953, with 99 FPS average. The GeForce GTX 1070 is a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in June 2016. OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76% If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 FYI Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° CPU speed:4709 MHz FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656). I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? 9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit 13FPS and 836 score. 3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please. (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. @ 1920×1080 Temp at 100% 66c This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. max fps in full HD: ~43 The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg CPU speed: 3400 MHz Results: Who’s laughing now. os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg But I feel like this is quite low compared to my old 6850. Might help. 9.18.13.2723 (9-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…! Peak temp: 94°C found on the 3GB GTX 1060. FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. Preset:1080 well check the 4th line: Treiber: 9.18.13.2680 (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 GeForce GTX 465 Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 59Deg C. GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album. 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! system memory:16324 MB To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545. CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. Update: 2016.08.25 2046 MB i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz Graphics drivers: AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. Sounds quite low to me . Furmark – 1920×1080 Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. GPU mem: 1300MHz GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz CPU speed: 3403 MHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz Backstory: I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz hate it when i do that lol. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Graphics score looks fine. 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3 GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1201) This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points Memory clock: 3004 MHz SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) System Info: Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table. FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. 1080p, 7970 x1 I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. But you should see a good difference , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} 700W FSP Aurum PSU 4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1) I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points MSAA samples: 0 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. Sabertooth 990FX But this is my first pascal card. How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 I am registered. Or passmark’s performance test 9? AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. Max GPU Temp: 0°C Is that bad if so what could be causing this? These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance). Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. Discussion. CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz should mention OS win8 64 bit The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. Testing furmark … That would mean I’m beating a 680! My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. RAM: 16383 MB – Radeon RX 5500 XT What are your thoughts? GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 let me know how it goes egdesignsvc@gmail.com, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above, http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg. That’s crazy, is that even possible? I let the test run for an hour. Temperature was 78°. Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Timespy: 6630 overall, 7299 Graphics score, Firestrike: 16204 overall, 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. Fan: 75%. Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius, Max GPU Temp: 70°C 4gb DDR3 ram. (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. Uhren: GPU: 1188 MHz, Speicher: 3004 MHz http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734, GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0) GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 resolution:1920×1080 HD4850 685/1050, I scored one notch more than 5770 @ 1141 on 720p preset. How about TimeSpy? 7850 Preset:1080 My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. If any of that might affect results, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098 i should be 2nd on list 3600points for radeon 7950, @Andrew try setting your graphics Who’s laughing now. Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. CPU speed: 3499 MHz und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин GPU core: 950MHz yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480, Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs. This seems surprisingly low to me. radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples so whats’ wrong? System Memory |2046MB 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified.
Kind Versteht Minus Rechnen Nicht,
Wetter Bingen 7 Tage,
Aquabasilea Rabatt Css,
Brustvergrößerung 350 Ml Vorher Nachher Bilder,
Uni Köln Bwl Erfahrungen,
Lebenslauf Vorlage Zum Ausfüllen,
Hotel Stadt Kufstein Jobs,
Marburg Oberstadt Café,
Maxim Pille Haut,